How It
Works.

Dialogue Arena gives teachers a live scoring interface to evaluate student arguments as they happen — no more guesswork at the end of a debate. Points are allocated in real time across logic, clarity, and rhetoric, with annotations attached directly to each statement.

• →Live point allocation per statement — not just a final grade
• →Annotate reasoning, fallacies, and rhetorical strengths
• →Instant post-session report for student review
• →Works with Google Meet, Zoom, or in-person

For TV programmes, podcasts, and live events, Dialogue Arena provides a structured scoring layer that makes debate outcomes visible and credible. Moderators score in real time while audiences follow along — every statement is on the record, every point earned is justified.

• →Real-time audience and referee scoring on screen
• →Moderator controls for cards, warnings, and time limits
• →Shareable post-show transcript with scores
• →Multi-platform compatible — studio, remote, or hybrid

When competing proposals need to be evaluated fairly, Dialogue Arena removes bias from the room. A neutral referee scores each argument on its merits — evidence, feasibility, and strategic clarity — while observers allocate their own point budgets. The result is a data-backed decision, not a political one.

• →Structured format keeps meetings productive and on-track
• →Referee and observer scoring produces a fair outcome
• →Full annotated transcript for board-level reporting
• →Works for strategy reviews, pitches, and team debates